Showing posts with label non-owner locks. Show all posts
Showing posts with label non-owner locks. Show all posts
Thursday, December 14, 2017

We wouldn't even be having this conversation if it was cars rather than computers!

›
Section 92 of Canada's copyright act indicates: Review of Act 92 Five years after the day on which this section comes into force a...
Monday, April 4, 2016

Perspectives on computer security and encryption from Apple, the FBI and I : Apple

›
Apple's perspective on computer security and encryption This is the third in a series that started with discussing the FBI and my own ...

Perspectives on computer security and encryption from Apple, the FBI and I : my use

›
My perspective on computer security and encryption This is a second article in a series that started with discussing the FBI and will end...

Perspectives on computer security and encryption from Apple, the FBI and I : FBI

›
Many people have weighed in on the Apple vs FBI case, including a speech by President Obama .  People in the technology industry have lined ...
Wednesday, October 21, 2015

A (non)Copyright question in a Canadian federal election 2015 quiz.

›
On Monday many co-workers were circulating around a links to political quizzes.  I was asked what I thought about one that included a copyri...
Sunday, October 11, 2015

Harper locking Canada into failed Clinton-era policy at root of software-based corruption

›
Most people have heard about the emissions scandal where Volkswagen was caught hiding the fact that they were deliberately breaking the law...
Monday, October 31, 2011

Are paywalls a Copyright issue?

›
We should answer the question of whether a paywall is a copyright issue, before we dive into the question of the importance of this question...
Friday, October 7, 2011

Will you explain why DRM is bad?

›
I was asked on twitter to explain why DRM is bad.  Given I have spent more than a decade talking about this topic, you would think there...